 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patriotism</title>
	<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/</link>
	<description>A Christian Conservative addressing the Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: under_the_mercy</title>
		<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-172</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-172</guid>
					<description>On the topic of patriotism, consider what you would be willing to die for, and what your government would be willing for you to die for. Here in America, we have it good, yet every citizen still has the duty to ask these qustions. Is this really for my country, is this what my country was based upon.

I the case of the war on terror, I believe the answer to these questions is yes. I support our presence in Iraq and the war on terror, though I believe that this war could have been avioded by less "global protection" in the past, at this point it would be pure folly to withdraw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of patriotism, consider what you would be willing to die for, and what your government would be willing for you to die for. Here in America, we have it good, yet every citizen still has the duty to ask these qustions. Is this really for my country, is this what my country was based upon.</p>
<p>I the case of the war on terror, I believe the answer to these questions is yes. I support our presence in Iraq and the war on terror, though I believe that this war could have been avioded by less &#8220;global protection&#8221; in the past, at this point it would be pure folly to withdraw.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Givler</title>
		<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-171</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-171</guid>
					<description>This country is worth dying for because it's the only country in the world based on the principle that government exists to serve the people and protect their rights.  The laws of every other nation (yes, even Canada, Rosie) place the rights of the government above the rights of the people.  That is tyranny, even when it manifests itself as socialized health care.

As one who has deployed twice to Iraq, and is likely to deploy again, I thank those of you who claim to support the troops, but if you intend to do that by bringing us home before mission is complete, keep your favors to yourself.  All you're really doing is making my job more difficult and dangerous.

And if Iraq is not essential to the war on terror, why are terrorists fighting so hard there?  Clearly it's a center of gravity, which makes it where we want to be.  Better in Iraq (where, by the way we do not torture people, nor have we ever) than in New York.  We fight them there so you don't have to here.

And one more thing: the First Gulf War ended in an armistice that depended on Saddam's fulfillment of UN mandates, among which were honoring weapons inspections and the No-Fly Zones (which were implemented, among other reasons to keep him from destroying his citizens' villages with helicopter gunships.) Saddam brought the resumption of conflict upon himself by interfering with inspections and habitually flying in the No-Fly Zones.  Prior to the resumption of the war one of Saddam's MiG 25 interceptors tried to shoot down a surveillance jet on which I was flying.  Don't you dare try to insinuate that Saddam was an innocent victim of some political intrigue.  He brought the resumption of conflict upon himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This country is worth dying for because it&#8217;s the only country in the world based on the principle that government exists to serve the people and protect their rights.  The laws of every other nation (yes, even Canada, Rosie) place the rights of the government above the rights of the people.  That is tyranny, even when it manifests itself as socialized health care.</p>
<p>As one who has deployed twice to Iraq, and is likely to deploy again, I thank those of you who claim to support the troops, but if you intend to do that by bringing us home before mission is complete, keep your favors to yourself.  All you&#8217;re really doing is making my job more difficult and dangerous.</p>
<p>And if Iraq is not essential to the war on terror, why are terrorists fighting so hard there?  Clearly it&#8217;s a center of gravity, which makes it where we want to be.  Better in Iraq (where, by the way we do not torture people, nor have we ever) than in New York.  We fight them there so you don&#8217;t have to here.</p>
<p>And one more thing: the First Gulf War ended in an armistice that depended on Saddam&#8217;s fulfillment of UN mandates, among which were honoring weapons inspections and the No-Fly Zones (which were implemented, among other reasons to keep him from destroying his citizens&#8217; villages with helicopter gunships.) Saddam brought the resumption of conflict upon himself by interfering with inspections and habitually flying in the No-Fly Zones.  Prior to the resumption of the war one of Saddam&#8217;s MiG 25 interceptors tried to shoot down a surveillance jet on which I was flying.  Don&#8217;t you dare try to insinuate that Saddam was an innocent victim of some political intrigue.  He brought the resumption of conflict upon himself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spunky Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-170</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-170</guid>
					<description>Excellent job Kierstyn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent job Kierstyn!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-169</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-169</guid>
					<description>I would like to respond to Rosie's question,

"Why do you love this counrty enough to give your life in its service?" 
 
 This is a very good question, and I commend you for honestly asking it. There are many reasons why I would die for my country. The reasons you gave-- the government, people, and land, are all right. I would die for an ideal, a belief, a system that I beileve worth defending. 

But it goes far, far deeper than that. This is the best way I can think of to explan it: would you die for your mother? I know I would. Why?  Because I think she's the best. Because I want to preserve her life. Because I cherish all that she stands for. But even more than that, because she is MY mother. It is my duty to give everything I have for the one that gave me life, for the one that made me all that I am. 

I feel a loyalty, a patriotism, to my mother because when you love something, you are willing to die for it. This is why we call our native country "the mother-land." 

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to respond to Rosie&#8217;s question,</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do you love this counrty enough to give your life in its service?&#8221; </p>
<p> This is a very good question, and I commend you for honestly asking it. There are many reasons why I would die for my country. The reasons you gave&#8211; the government, people, and land, are all right. I would die for an ideal, a belief, a system that I beileve worth defending. </p>
<p>But it goes far, far deeper than that. This is the best way I can think of to explan it: would you die for your mother? I know I would. Why?  Because I think she&#8217;s the best. Because I want to preserve her life. Because I cherish all that she stands for. But even more than that, because she is MY mother. It is my duty to give everything I have for the one that gave me life, for the one that made me all that I am. </p>
<p>I feel a loyalty, a patriotism, to my mother because when you love something, you are willing to die for it. This is why we call our native country &#8220;the mother-land.&#8221; </p>
<p>I hope this helps.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-168</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kpaulino.com/2006/09/10/patriotism/#comment-168</guid>
					<description>hey, i like your idea. :yep: i saw your blog from World magazine. decided to check it out. i'm an homeschooled teen, also. 
if you would like, you can visit a message board i'm on.... [URL]http://www.christianguitar.org/forums/index.php[/URL]
My user name is J_freek, and my blog is [URL]http://www.christianguitar.org/forums/showthread.php?t=131759[/URL]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, i like your idea. :yep: i saw your blog from World magazine. decided to check it out. i&#8217;m an homeschooled teen, also.<br />
if you would like, you can visit a message board i&#8217;m on&#8230;. [URL]http://www.christianguitar.org/forums/index.php[/URL]<br />
My user name is J_freek, and my blog is [URL]http://www.christianguitar.org/forums/showthread.php?t=131759[/URL]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
